Lower Cancer Rates in Vegans
The Oxford arm of the European Prospective Investigations Into Cancer (EPIC) has released a report showing that after an average of 14.9 years of follow-up, vegetarians (.88, .82-.95) and pesco-vegetarians (.88, .80-.97) each have a 12% lower risk of cancer than other meat-eaters (1).
Breaking the participants into smaller diet groups showed that vegans had a 19% lower risk of cancer:
Pesco – .88 (.80, .97)
Lacto-ovo – .89 (.83, .96)
Vegan – .81 (.66, .98)
I have updated the General Cancer section of the VeganHealth.org article, Cancer, Vegetarianism, and Diet. If you go there, you can see that the findings for vegans were similar to those in the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2), the other ongoing study containing a large number of vegans.
Unlike the findings for vegans and diabetes, the statistical significance of these findings for cancer are not large. I like confidence intervals to be tighter before I get too excited about saying a vegan diet can prevent a disease. However, the consistency between EPIC-Oxford and AHS-2 should provide some assurance.
Some notes on these findings:
– The results above are not adjusted for body mass index (BMI). Adjusting for BMI slightly changed the findings for vegetarians (.90, .93-.96) and for vegans (.82, .68-1.00).
– The previous report from EPIC-Oxford had followed participants through 2005 while this current report followed them through 2010. In the intervening years, cancers increased 50%.
– Diets were assessed at baseline and after 5 years; 88% of the participants remained in their original diet category.
– No single specific cancer type could explain the differences between the diet groups; to date there has been very little consistency found between the various cancers (such as colorectal) and diet group.
Reference
1. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Crowe FL, Bradbury KE, Schmidt JA, Travis RC. Cancer in British vegetarians: updated analyses of 4998 incident cancers in a cohort of 32,491 meat eaters, 8612 fish eaters, 18,298 vegetarians, and 2246 vegans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jun 4. | link
June 19th, 2014 at 7:22 am
Just link to the study please. That’s what I came here to see.
June 19th, 2014 at 10:32 am
Toby,
I link to the study at the end of the citation in the Reference section.
June 19th, 2014 at 12:36 pm
Thank you for the over-view and the link to the study, I and I’m sure others appreciate it.
June 23rd, 2014 at 1:13 am
Yeah that’s a bit of a rude response. I don’t come here to read all the original studies but precisely because I appreciate you writing a short overview and evaluating how convincing the studies are, in the context of your knowledge of other studies! Thanks Jack.
June 23rd, 2014 at 9:29 am
Silvia,
Thank you for your kind words!
June 24th, 2014 at 6:18 pm
Vegans do well in this study but the associations could still be due to residual confounding influences (they were certainly healthier at baseline! i.e. self-selection bias).
August 25th, 2014 at 5:20 pm
Seems like a lottery study since it was concluded on city dwellers living in populated cities. Seems pointless since everyone is prone to getting cancer.
August 23rd, 2015 at 1:35 pm
‘Cancer in British vegetarians’ (beginning of the name of the study). a lot different from ‘vegans all around the world’, would be nice to specify it